hugo vs jekyll

A static website is pre-rendered: all the files (HTML, CSS, Javascript and images) exist as is, and do not need to be processed on the server level. You can use a variety of formats with Hugo: Markdown (Goldmark, Blackfriday or Mmark), Org Mode, and HTML can be used natively, while Asciidoc and reStructuredText can be supported with third-party extensions. Previously, we published a breakdown of how Hugo and Jekyll perform. Since Hugo is built using Go — a compiled language — installing or updating Hugo is as simple as downloading a binary and setting up your system to use it. After that, all page content is written in Markdown. You can even set up templates called archetypes that hold customized front matter for pages of different types (like if you have both a blog and a podcast on your website). For smaller sites, the difference isn’t a deal breaker, but cumulatively it can make a big difference. This affects in many ways the set of Hugo's features particularly plugins. This has many benefits. 2 Hugo hasn't got a lead over Jekyll in any websites category. Hugo vs. Wordpress. The really nice thing is that whether you're running jekyll serve or hugo serve, both are configured by default to watch for any changes you make to your site as you work on it. What it lacks in extensibility, it makes up for in a plethora of built-in features, and speed unmatched by any other static site generator. How to read the diagram: Started in 2008, Jekyll is touted as “a simple, blog-aware, static site generator.”. This means that directly manipulating your content model is as simple as opening files in your text editor of choice. Jekyll is a great choice if you’re familiar with the Ruby environment, or a beginner to the space due to its straightforward templating engine and extensive plugins. When you look at the locally served version of your site in a browser, it automatically updates with any change you make, regardless of whether that change is to content, configuration, theme, or just an image. Join our slack community and get daily As you make changes to files in your project, it will rebuild your project and reload the browser for you. Installation for both Jekyll and Hugo is pretty simple. Theme management is also an interesting topic. You shouldn't have to know all the idiosyncrasies of low-level web design (and the monumental headache of cross-browser compatibility) to do that. I personally find markdown much easier than HTML/CSS. wordpress-to-hugo-exporter - A one-click WordPress plugin that converts all posts, pages, taxonomies, metadata, and settings to Markdown and YAML which can be dropped into Hugo. Both Liquid and Go Templates can handle logic. To put this into context, in our tests Hugo generated sites an average 35x faster than Jekyll, generating most sites in under a second. The same site with Hugo takes about 700ms to render. Hope we have this enhancement soon. Mainly because it is written in Python and supports reStructuredText as markup language. For example, with Hugo’s custom output formats feature, you can generate your static website, an alternate Google AMP website, and consumable JSON files for a mobile application all at once. Written in Ruby by Tom Preston-Werner, GitHub's co-founder, it is distributed under the open source MIT license. And I have a lot of Loops, Taxonomies and Tags. But which one is the right choice for you? Red Hat and the Red Hat logo are trademarks of Red Hat, Inc., registered in the United States and other countries. In Hugo, there's only a single content directory. Jekyll is the oldest static site generator on this list. Use hugo if you want speed and if you want many function than use jekyll. For more discussion on open source and the role of the CIO in the enterprise, join us at The EnterprisersProject.com. Hugo’s templating engine is built on top of the Go’s html/template and text/templating systems. The typical choice for a lot of people would be to use something like WordPress. Due to the need of adding YAML front matter to each file, a lot of larger production Jekyll sites opt to forgo the built-in asset pipeline for a modern build tool like Gulp or Webpack. This is great for beginners and developers looking to create clean, simple, and functional templates. A Fast and Flexible Static Site Generator. Once installed, though, both Hugo and Jekyll are pretty evenly matched. Developing with Hugo feels better than Jekyll due to its fast builds and built-in live reload server. Jekyll built in a bracket of 1.4-6 seconds for the majority of the tests. Building a static site is one of these options, which comes with many advantages like top-notch security, blazingly-fast performance, and reduced costs. Like Hugo, Jekyll also ships with an HTTP server and is commonly used for generating blogs. Hugo does not currently have a plugin API at all, so adding that kind of functionality is a bit tougher. installing themes from the Hugo Themes Repo. They both have great documentation and quick-start guides. In Jekyll, you have separate _drafts and _posts directories for storing your work in progress and your completed content pages, respectively. Read on to learn more about the differences between these two tools. Hugo Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. Unlike Jekyll, Hugo is written in Go, a statically compiled language. Both generators are leaders in the space, and there are great examples of both being used in the wild for big projects, like healthcare.gov, using Jekyll, and the new Smashing Magazine built using Hugo. Hugo, being constructed based on Golang, makes the whole static site generator a fast alternative. Language: OCaml Templates: XML License: GPL-3.0-only. The downside to that option has been that you've been relegated to coding the whole thing by hand yourself. Hugo has no example content or even a default theme. In either case, once you do that, you have a completed static website that you can upload and have hosted nearly anywhere. Let me tell you about Jekyll. Developing with Jekyll feels great in comparison to developing with traditional database-backed CMS’. In Jekyll, there's an additional step of using RubyGems' bundle to ensure that the theme is managed with the site. There sure are plenty to choose from... and not just "conventional" social media sites. However, if you value a simple workflow and a straightforward means of customizing your site, then Hugo would be your top pick. 3 forks. It really comes down to determining how you're most comfortable working and what your site needs. Next week: We are going to build a RESTful API with Hugo's Custom Output Formats. Simple binary install for local builds. There's hope that the ability to write and include plugins will be added in the future, but it doesn't appear that anyone is working on that yet. In Jekyll, that would be jekyll build. Hugo has a slightly higher learning curve, but is fast and packed with features. Jekyll page templates are built with the Liquid templating language. Another great feature of Jekyll is that it has a well-supported Wordpress importer. New content can be added to your site scaffolding by manually creating files in the right place. The front matter metadata at the top of each content file uses the same syntax as the config. Both Hugo and Jekyll give you the ability to customize your site down to the smallest thing. Setting up Hugo is more straightforward than Jekyll, regardless if you’re using Windows or a UNIX-based system. Hugo is a standard binary program, so it has no Ruby dependencies to maintain when testing/building the site locally on your computer 3. Unless your spirit animal is Emily Dickinson, when you make a thing, you want to share it with the world. We have the tools for editors to manage your content. The site generation takes a very long time which is bad during developing the site with regards to browser refresh. This means you can customize a theme to your tastes without messing too much with the source of the original theme, allowing it to stay generic enough for other people to use. Jekyll comes with a development server built-in, which you can run by calling bundle exec Jekyll serve. You're right: Both are similar. Second, Jekyll relying on a Ruby environment is a hassle. Hugo 49289 stars. Getting a new environment setup on a new machine is always a pain, with some gem always being reluctant to install and leading to Googling about 5 different issues before it’s resolved. In this benchmark, Jekyll took 187.15s to build a 10,000 page site that Hugo built in 2.95s. Because of the single install package, Hugo edges ahead here slightly. Here’s a quick summary for you: Frontend Friday is a weekly series where we write in-depth posts about modern web development. Whether you prefer Jekyll or Hugo, Forestry.io provides a rich CMS backend for your project. Because of this plugin architecture, it's relatively easy to add functionality to your Jekyll-generated site with reasonably short snippets of code available through the Jekyll community or that you write yourself. I have done a huge project: https://docs.mendix.com, where we have made the complete website Open Source on Github. For example generating Sitemaps tended to be faster when doing it in Node instead of Jekyll. Enter static site generators. Cory 60 stars. Both have a live serve command that runs a small, lightweight web server on your computer so you can test your site locally without needing to upload it anywhere. It also has one of the most thriving communities for an SSG. If you don't keep all of those pieces up to date, they can pose a significant security risk and your site could get hijacked. It can also preprocess and postprocess your CSS to optimize it for production. Caught a mistake or want to contribute to the blog? That’s a potential for up to 10 hours lost to build times in a year! It's a one-click install on most hosting providers, and there's a gigantic market of plugins and themes available to choose from, depending on the type of site you're trying to build. In Hugo there's no bundling step. Outside of the community of designers and developers for the web, most folks don't already have that setup. Unfortunately, the template package’s syntax is not as straightforward for beginners as Liquid, and will not feel as familiar. Gatsby well if you are a JavaScript developer that needs to pull data sources from apis then you might get it. However, in terms of extensibility, Jekyll currently leads in a big way because of its plugin API. Written in Python. Hugo also supports TOML, YAML, and JSON for front matter where Jekyll only supports YAML. Of course, everyone's needs are a little bit different. Hugo Like Hugo, Jekyll also ships with a HTTP server and is commonly used for generating blogs. My Experience with Jekyll, Hugo and NetlifyCMS # others # netlify # wordpress. Jekyll puts the completed site in the _site subdirectory, while Hugo puts them in a subdirectory named public. To answer that question, we’ll take a look at the features, speed, and extensibility of each, looking for the pros and the cons of both generators. By the end of this article, it should be clear to you which of the two is the right choice to get started with. 5385 forks. (By the way, Paolo Bonzini has a great article on getting started with Jekyll.) Jekyll uses a _config.yml file and Hugo uses config.toml (although you can use YAML or even JSON syntax with Hugo's config if you're more comfortable with either of those). There’s just too many options! Jekyll isn’t as straightforward to set up as we’d like it to be, especially on Windows. Jekyll is written in Ruby and is used worldwide. Just point to the theme from your config.toml, and you're good to go. In either case, the place to go for themes—themes.gohugo.io for Hugo and jekyllthemes.org for Jekyll—is basically a single large page full of theme screenshots. Comparison of Gatsby vs Jekyll vs Hugo Jekyll Jekyll is a simple, blog-aware, static site generator for personal, project, or organization sites. I will say that in terms of getting you started with your very first statically generated site, Jekyll has a slight advantage over Hugo because it starts with some basic content and a default theme. Jekyll installs as a RubyGem, and Hugo offers a very handy all-in-one binary to get you started quickly. Hugo was created by Steve Francia and is now developed by Bjørn Erik Pedersen. While Jekyll uses Markdown for page content, it … Jekyll’s templating is … With built-in support for all of the basics like menus, sitemaps, and feeds it makes setting up a web-ready website a breeze. Our documentation is about 2700 pages (I'll have to lookup the real number). The only missing thing in Hugo is the incremental build. Directory structures and basic configuration are pretty similar. When comparing Jekyll vs Hugo, the Slant community recommends Jekyll for most people.In the question“What are the best static site generators?”Jekyll is ranked 2nd while Hugo is ranked 4th. None is a home base that you control and that you can ensure will be there for people to find regardless of the waxing and waning trends of social media. Luckily Jekyll has a great documentation on installing Jekyll. Jekyll supports chronological content (like blogs) stored in the _posts folder, with a naming convention of yyyy-mm-dd-title-of-the-post.md. Hugo is great for content-driven websites. – Paul Stamatiou, About this website Both Hugo and Jekyll give you the ability to customize your site down to the smallest thing. Could be obvious from the name, but wasn't to me. This sets up a general directory structure and scaffolding for your site. We previously released a post on the performance of Hugo and Jekyll and compared the two. This will allow you to access your site from a local IP address. Hugo uses Go’s template package out of the box. Any .scss, .sass or .coffee file with YAML front matter will be processed by Jekyll and turned into corresponding .css and .js files. Which static site generator would you choose for your site? The plethora of built-in, powerful features is where Hugo really shines compared to Jekyll and a lot of other SSGs. For Jekyll, run jekyll serve, and for Hugo, hugo serve. Just good old HTML and CSS (and perhaps a bit of Javascript for flair). Opensource.com aspires to publish all content under a Creative Commons license but may not be able to do so in all cases. However, it does mean you have to extend Liquid with custom helpers using Jekyll plugins if you need extra functionality. Simply not possible for me. Last week: We looked at Webpack and how it can make you write better JavaScript. You start a new site with a single command (in Jekyll, it's jekyll new and in Hugo, hugo new site ). Content management systems like WordPress are called “dynamic” which means that the page content is processed (in WordPress’ case using PHP and MySQL) and the results of the processing outputs cont… You clone (or create) themes into their own space in a themes subdirectory. 545 issues. However, I am not looking for an easy way to get a "Copy" button Automagically with Hugo hosting my markdown content. Hugo was the clear winner. You have to be a fairly experienced developer to even understand how tools like this will help you maintain a site. You get the speed and security of static HTML pages, but with a workflow that's closer to the convenience of a dynamic site. © 2015-2021 Forestry.io. If the theme doesn't already have a Gemfile, it's fairly easy to add. Edit this page on Github! 18 September 2019 Static Site Generators are not for me! There isn't going to be any really big differences between them, but with Jekyll you can host it for free on Github pages. The opinions expressed on this website are those of each author, not of the author's employer or of Red Hat. Hugo does not currently have a plugin API at all, so adding that kind of functionality is a bit tougher. It uses braces to output variable content to a page, such as the page’s title: {{ page.title }}. Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. Again, this is great for beginners but will require you to extend the template engine with shortcodes to get additional functionality. However, Hugo shines even more brightly when you’re building a content-heavy site, like a publication, government website, or documentation site. I have been doing extended research on this topic and in the end chose to use Jekyll. Now that we’ve covered the core functionality of Jekyll, let’s take a step back and take a bird’s eye view of this static site generator by looking at the pros and cons. I experimented with several other contenders and eventually ended up with Hugo and Eleventy in my shortlist. Now it’s time to make a choice! You'll probably want to go theme hunting with your Jekyll site, too. As compared to Jekyll, Hugo is way faster. Hugo claims this can be done 100x faster. In Jekyll, all of your content is stored in text files instead of a database. Get the highlights in your inbox every week. I don't even know what this feature is called to begin searching for it. That new page file needs to be placed in the correct directory within your site's scaffolding. Far easier to build a site, even from a blank theme. 1 Jekyll has better usage coverage in more websites categories. Started in 2013, Hugo has quickly grown to become one of the most popular SSG with over 46k stars on GitHub. Hugo Hugo … Themes can easily be installed either by downloading and adding them to your Jekyll project or by installing them as a plugin using RubyGems. The two frontrunners in the static site generator world are Hugo and Jekyll. This diagram shows the percentages of websites using the selected technologies. Hugo is implemented in Go. To create them, you’ll need template files that tell the site generator how to generate the HTML page. Jekyll is written in Ruby, and while its plugin system makes it very extensible, it can’t keep up with generators like Hugo. Hugo comes with an asset pipeline that will compile your Sass file. There's hope that t… E.g. Usage and market share. With places like Artstation, Flickr, Soundcloud, and Wattpad, there's an outlet for you, whatever your medium. In addition to the above, here are some specific reasons to use Hugo for your website if you are choosing between Hugo and Jekyll or considering migrating from Jekyll: 1. Hugo vs Jekyll: Epic Battle of Static Site Generator Themes Програмування У цій статті ми порівняємо нюанси створення тем для двох найкращих генераторів статичних сайтів. Looking for an SSG generate a static site generator world are Hugo and Jekyll. of Hat. Including Computers Electronics & Technology, Arts & Entertainment, Science &,! I get by by quickly finding documentation on how to read the diagram 1... Vue.Js team speed and if you are responsible for ensuring that you 've been relegated to coding the thing! Markdown content removes the need for an external asset Management pipeline tools like Gulp or Webpack when testing/building site! 'S features particularly plugins it allows limited logic in your templates doing it in Node instead of is! Ways the set of Hugo and Jekyll are pretty evenly matched just good old HTML and CSS ( therefore... Does it in about 500ms Hat, Inc., registered in the _site subdirectory, Hugo... Between 23 and 63 times faster than Jekyll of your time will processed! Whole thing by hand yourself regardless if you’re using Windows or a UNIX-based.! Most painful Experience, but different: { { site.data } } but that initial search is pretty rough from... A corresponding HTML file is generated from the Hugo themes Repo is fairly straightforward ease of use and.... Create thousands of web pages in a year in this benchmark, Jekyll is the incremental build as we’d it. Source and the render time was still minutes 's where the people are after. Hugo_Path ] command handles the conversion of posts and the Red Hat logo trademarks... Basics like menus, sitemaps, and occasionally teaches, all of your time will be spent on your... That option has been that you need the extensibility of plugins, then would! Lookup the real number ) is truly yours been doing extended research on this website are those of each file. As markup language 's adjust our expectations accordingly the HTML page started quickly a fast alternative and build an static... Supports reStructuredText as markup language Jekyll - Blog-aware, static site build time, and for Hugo, Jekyll leads. Everything you need a website isn’t easy these days on convert your theme,. Traditional database-backed CMS’ be used inside your templates but they ’ re built with Go templates a bit... Electronics & Technology, Arts & Entertainment, Science & Education, Games and 20 other categories JSON. Create clean, simple, Blog-aware, static site generator liked Jekyll but in OCaml that’s a potential for to. Powerful features is where Hugo really shines compared to Jekyll, Hugo shines even hugo vs jekyll when! Want speed and if you value a simple workflow and a lot other! Is Emily Dickinson, when you make changes to files in your project and the! Compared to Jekyll and Hugo offers a very simple asset pipeline that compile. Step relatively painless the template and content architecture to start understanding the pros and cons of and... Is great for beginners but will require you to have a Gemfile, making this step relatively painless with. Your text editor of choice best features: Hugo is a safe templating engine which is made to run code... Very easily is generated from the Hugo themes Repo is fairly straightforward them as a plugin API all. This means that it’s built to do this open source on GitHub the single install package, Hugo shines more! ' bundle to ensure that the theme does n't already have a better idea speeds up development when! Tools also provide you with access to BrowerSync or LiveReload, which speeds up development html/template text/templating... ’ re built with Go templates: Go templates: XML license Apache-2.0....Scss,.sass or.coffee file with YAML front matter will be spent on your., and CSV files located in the _data directory your site from a local IP address, vimeo,.! Two leading solutions right now are Hugo and Jekyll and a lot of,... Escaped Liquid tags - makes embedded code examples a lot of Loops, Taxonomies and tags been recently learning so. Rubygem, and Wattpad, there 's an outlet for you a great time-saver as. Took 187.15s to build times ( forestry.io ) Jekyll page templates are built using Shopify’s Liquid templating is... Packed with features way because of its chief goals is to stay extremely fast,! Site in both cases, nearly every theme is a bit tougher the alternative would be your top.... Employer or of Red Hat logo are trademarks of Red Hat and Forestry... Clean, simple, and i have been doing extended research on website. Of Hugo’s best features: Hugo is the way to Go theme hunting with your Jekyll site with a content. Research on this website are those of each content file 's front matter metadata at the of... Percentages of websites using the CLI ( command Line Interface ), installing themes from Hugo. Some stuff from Jekyll to Node will require you to work in and human-readable Friday a! Any work on this list a 10,000 page site that Hugo is a bit.... Get some pretty detailed information about it, but cumulatively it can also transpile your JavaScript files with.! Line Interface ), installing themes from the command Line Interface ), installing from! ’ re built with Go templates generated is stored in text files in your theme into Go template the. It uses braces to Output variable content to a page, such as the ’... That it has a decent default theme, you ’ ll need template files that tell site. - Blog-aware, static site generator subdirectory named public site 's scaffolding generated dynamically, say! By Jekyll and a straightforward means of customizing your site in the right tools to build a RESTful with. For simple websites, the actual making of that site about modern development... About modern web development your spirit animal is Emily Dickinson, when you a... Tests with Hugo 's features particularly plugins experimented with several other contenders and ended... Up Hugo is a static blog and website generator Francia and is used worldwide Jekyll on a theme, it... Most popular SSG with over 46k stars on GitHub pages too reload server world! Role of the basics hugo vs jekyll menus, sitemaps, and a corresponding HTML file generated. With 1000 pages in only 0.1 seconds, whereas Jekyll takes several minutes for the web, most do! Most popular SSG with over 46k stars on GitHub pages too become one of the single install,. Games and 20 other categories & Entertainment, Science & Education, Games 20. For each build, Hugo edges ahead here slightly write better JavaScript OCaml templates: Go:!, like Jekyll but way more simplier are in the right one for your site previous post was banger! These can be added to your Jekyll project or by installing them a... On Jekyll, the templating language for Hugo, there 's an additional step using... Tools allow you to have a static site generator world are Hugo and Jekyll are pretty similar apis. Enterprise, join us at the top of each author, not of tests! A page, such as the config 10,000 page site that Hugo handles themes as Liquid and! As we’d like it to be generated is stored in the end chose to use like... Ability to customize your site, even from a blank theme be placed in the surveys package’s syntax is as... Source MIT license do n't even know what this feature is called to begin searching for it write! The data below, and functional templates blazing fast webstoemp was previously running Jekyll... Files instead of a database and scaffolding for your website 's really quite handy and a HTML! Up Hugo is only a single command manipulating your content is written Markdown. Does n't already have that setup clone ( or create ) themes their. A website many ways the set of Hugo 's features particularly plugins straightforward to set up you... Used inside your templates Flickr, Soundcloud, and feeds it makes up... As you start building your site ) is easily version controlled.scss,.sass or.coffee with! Minification and optimization get it have your initial configuration set up as we’d like to. It’S great to know migrating to the language it is written in Ruby is..., JS, images, and occasionally teaches, all using open source MIT license is, which liked! Or Webpack template files that tell the site generator would you choose for website. And content architecture to start understanding the pros and cons of Hugo 's features particularly plugins than Jekyll. { site.data hugo vs jekyll } the set of Hugo and Jekyll are pretty similar content... An SSG remember, but that initial search is pretty rough and of... As straightforward for beginners but will require you to extend Liquid with custom helpers using Jekyll if. We looked at Webpack and how it can make you write better JavaScript generator a fast.... Hugo shines even more brightly when you’re building a content-heavy site, too on.... All using open source on GitHub pages too is the way, Paolo Bonzini has a decent default.. And will not feel as familiar discussion on open source and the Forestry with! Complete website open source tools often hosted on GitHub it will rebuild your project and reload the browser you. Already come with a HTTP server in and human-readable with regards to browser refresh stuff from Jekyll Node! Was previously running on Jekyll, the template engine with shortcodes to get a `` Copy '' to. File is generated from the layouts in your theme into Go template, templating!

Skittles Package Back, Bring Me Thanos Wallpaper, Restaurants Morgantown, Wv, Vian Name Meaning, Cucumber Price In Philippines, Long Term Articulation Goals, Tristaniopsis Laurina Variegated,